Opinion
Argued March 12, 1895
Decided April 9, 1895
August Becker for appellant.
Patrick F. King for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except HAIGHT, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Scott v. Calladine
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1895
41 N.E. 90 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Scott v. Calladine
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1895
41 N.E. 90 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Scott v. Calladine
Case Details
Full title:FRANCES B. SCOTT, Appellant, v . FRANCES CALLADINE, Impleaded, etc.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 9, 1895
Citations
41 N.E. 90 (N.Y. 1895)
145 N.Y. 639
67 N.Y. St. Rptr. 900
Citing Cases
Lindt v. Henshel
Indeed, even if it had been her husband who contracted for the purchase of the sculpture in his wife's name,…