Scott v. Boudreau

3 Citing cases

  1. Pilot Travel Ctrs. v. Womack

    No. 2023-CA-00035-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2024)

    "Well-established precedent holds 'that when a party fails to make a contemporaneous objection at trial, he waives any error on that issue on appeal.'" Scott v. Boudreau, 375 So.3d 688, 697 (¶47) (Miss. Ct. App. 2023) (quoting McCullough v. McCullough, 52 So.3d 373, 379 (¶25) (Miss. Ct. App. 2009)).

  2. Morland v. Morland

    No. 2023-CA-00237-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2024)

    This Court has found that although all the factors are important, the chancellor has the ultimate discretion to weigh the evidence the way he sees fit in determining the child's best interest. Scott v. Boudreau, 375 So.3d 688, 694 (¶23) (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). Ultimately, in his consideration of these factors, the judgment indicates the chancellor gave consideration to the evidence that showed, as a thirteen-year-old female, C.M. felt closer to her mother, that both parties have had stable home environments and employment, and that the parties were in extramarital relationships.

  3. Walker v. Hasty

    395 So. 3d 424 (Miss. Ct. App. 2024)

    "So long as there is substantial evidence in the record that, if found credible by the chancellor, would provide support for the chancellor’s decision, this Court may not intercede simply to substitute our collective opinion for that of the chancellor." Scott v. Boudreau, 375 So. 3d 688, 692 (¶14) (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). [20] ¶42.