From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Baton Rouge City Constables Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-289-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 11, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-289-JWD-EWD

10-11-2017

VERNON SCOTT v. BATON ROUGE CITY CONSTABLES OFFICE


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report issued September 22, 2017, (Doc. 7), and to which no objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (Doc. 28) is GRANTED and that this matter is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own costs incurred as a result of the instant removal.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 11, 2017.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Scott v. Baton Rouge City Constables Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-289-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Scott v. Baton Rouge City Constables Office

Case Details

Full title:VERNON SCOTT v. BATON ROUGE CITY CONSTABLES OFFICE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-289-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 11, 2017)

Citing Cases

Rayner v. Stringer Water Works Ass'n

Circumstances include whether the charge was attached to the complaint, the way the charge was referenced,…