From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Dec 27, 2010
Case No. 5:10-cv-463-Orl-18TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-463-Orl-18TGW.

December 27, 2010


ORDER


The case comes before the court on the United States Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. The Court having reviewed the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, and there being no objections to the report filed by the plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby APPROVED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to respond to the court's orders. Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

It is SO ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, this 27 day of December, 2010.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff, on September 10, 2010. filed a complaint in this case seeking review of a denial of a claim for Social Security benefits. The plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). and that request was granted on September 15, 2010 (Doc. 5).

This court issued a Related Case Order and Track One Notice. on September 14, 2010, which required review and certification of compliance with Local Rule 1.04(d) within fourteen days (Doc. 4). The plaintiff did not respond to this Order. On November 5, 2010, an Order to Show Cause was entered, directing the plaintiff to file a response to the Order of September 14, 2010, within fifteen days, and further warned that noncompliance may result in dismissal of the case (Doc. 7). As of this date, there is no record in the court file that the plaintiff has responded to this Order.

For these reasons, I recommend that this action be dismissed unless the plaintiff, in response to this report and recommendation, shows good cause for her failure to respond to prior Orders of this court.

DATED: DECEMBER 9, 2010

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).


Summaries of

Scott v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division
Dec 27, 2010
Case No. 5:10-cv-463-Orl-18TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Scott v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN E. SCOTT Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ocala Division

Date published: Dec 27, 2010

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-463-Orl-18TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2010)