From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. American Tobacco Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 2, 1999
731 So. 2d 189 (La. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-C-3016

February 26, 1999 Corrected Opinion March 2, 1999.

IN RE: American Tobacco Co.; American Brands Inc.; Fortune Brands Inc.; BATUS Holdings Inc.; Batus Inc.; Brown Williamson Tobacco Cor; Lorillard Inc.; Lorillard Tobacco Co.; Loews Corp.; Philip Morris Companies Inc.; R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; RJR Nabisco Inc.; Tobacco Institute Inc.; UST Inc.; United States Tobacco Co.; Philip Morris Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. "K" Number 96-8461; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98CA-0452; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. "K" Number 96-8461.


Denied. See per curiam.

HTL

PFC

WFM

CDK

JTK

MARCUS, J. not on panel; recused.

VICTORY, J. would grant the writ.

TRAYLOR, J. would grant the writ.


Denied. However, the conclusion of the court of appeal that the reasonable cost of necessary medical monitoring falls within the scope of defendant's liability was purely dicta, unrelated to the class certification issue. We do not consider the correctness of this conclusion, and the trial court should not feel bound by this conclusion when the issue is presented in that court.


Summaries of

Scott v. American Tobacco Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 2, 1999
731 So. 2d 189 (La. 1999)
Case details for

Scott v. American Tobacco Company

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA SCOTT AND DEANIA M. JACKSON, ET AL v. THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 2, 1999

Citations

731 So. 2d 189 (La. 1999)

Citing Cases

River Birch, Inc. v. Robin

As such, these comments should have been omitted, as they have no precedential value for this or any other…

Mandalay v. Energy

Thus, they do not bind this court, and EDC's exception of res judicata is without merit. See La. R.S.…