Opinion
No. CIV S-08-2227 GEB KJM P.
August 25, 2009
ORDER
Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus, has filed a motion asking that respondent be held in default because respondent has filed a motion to dismiss instead of an answer. However, petitioner fails to point to any law in support of his request or any facts justifying such a request. Petitioner's request (#26) is denied. Petitioner is warned that if he continues to file frivolous motions such as the one addressed here, he will be sanctioned, possibly with limitations on filings or dismissal of this action.