From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott Properties Inc. v. Lawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 2, 1971
183 S.E.2d 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

46249.

SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 1971.

DECIDED JULY 2, 1971.

Action on contract. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Webb.

Peek, Whaley Haldi, J. Corbett Peek, Jr., R. Joseph Costanzo, Jr., for appellant.

Hatcher, Meyerson, Oxford Irvin, Clifford Oxford, for appellees.


The appellant enumerates error on the judgment of the trial court, after hearing evidence, on the grounds that it is contrary to the evidence, without evidence to support it, against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. All these grounds invoke a consideration of the evidence presented on the trial in which the plaintiff sought to recover alleged earned but unpaid sale commissions in the sum of $14,891.38 and lost profits in the sum of $56,000 due to a sale of the property by the defendant without protection of the plaintiff's rights under the contract as exclusive selling agent of cemetery lots. The appellant did not specify a transcript of the evidence and none appears in the record on appeal. There is accordingly no question presented which can be passed on by this court. Seaton v. Redisco, 115 Ga. App. 80 ( 153 S.E.2d 728); Commercial Nat. Bank of Cedartown v. Moore Ford Co., 121 Ga. App. 424 ( 174 S.E.2d 201). Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 1971 — DECIDED JULY 2, 1971.


Summaries of

Scott Properties Inc. v. Lawson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 2, 1971
183 S.E.2d 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Scott Properties Inc. v. Lawson

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT PROPERTIES, INC. v. LAWSON et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 2, 1971

Citations

183 S.E.2d 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
183 S.E.2d 238

Citing Cases

King v. Cox

3. In the absence of a transcript of evidence we cannot consider the second assignment of error arguing the…

Farmers Feed Fertilizer Company, Inc. v. Lynn

In view of the ruling herein made the issues raised by the remaining enumerations of error are moot.…