From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scordley v. Olsher

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 21, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 424 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

May 21, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, XAVIER C. RICCOBONO, J.

Archer, Bosch Engeler ( Louis L. Archer of counsel), for appellant.

Herman F. Beltzer and David Joseph Friedman for respondents.


The contract between the parties was prepared by the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs, as well as the defendant, are bound by the provisions thereof. Plaintiffs, having failed to prove that they gave the defendant the five-day written notice specifically provided for in that contract, did not make out a prima facie case and were not entitled to a recovery.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Scordley v. Olsher

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 21, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 424 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Scordley v. Olsher

Case Details

Full title:JACK E. SCORDLEY et al., Doing Business as DON PALLINI DANCE STUDIO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 424 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
186 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. v. United Artists Corp.

The termination of the contract in this case without the required previous notice and without a certificate…

Filmline Prod. v. United Artists

Therefore, UA could not terminate the contract on the basis of this alleged breach. Cf. General Supply and…