From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scoglio v. Scoglio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 24, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute because discovery was not complete. Moreover, the plaintiffs correctly contend that they had a justifiable excuse for their failure to file a note of issue, because discovery was not complete ( see, Markarian v. Hundert, 204 A.D.2d 697; Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A.D.2d 25). Further, since the defendant John Scoglio failed to sufficiently demonstrate his right to judgment as a matter of law, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).

Bracken, J.P., Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scoglio v. Scoglio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1998
253 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Scoglio v. Scoglio

Case Details

Full title:DANA M. SCOGLIO, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, VIRGINIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

McCracken v. Nitto Kohki USA, Inc.

Thereafter, the injured plaintiff timely filed a note of issue. Since the appellants were still seeking…

Gonzalez v. County of Westchester

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which…