From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scoggins v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Aug 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 04-10814-PBS (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-10814-PBS

08-19-2011

ALLEN SCOGGINS, Petitioner v. TIMOTHY HALL, Respondent


PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO BOWLER, U.S.M.J. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS DATED JUNE 1, 2011

Now comes the Petitioner, Allen Scoggins, and files his Objections to the Report and Recommendation of Bowler, U.S.M.J., on this 22nd day of June 2011. Petitioner received the Report and Recommendation by mail on June 10, 2011 at MCI-Shirley Prison which is noted in the prison legal mail reciept log book, petitioner's Objections are as folloews:

1. Petitioner Objects To Magistrates Recommendation to dismiss Ground Two Conviction Was Obtained In Violation Of Privilege against Self Incrimination Based On The Magistrates Finding Petitioner Failed To Show Cause Or A Fundamental Miscarriage Of Justice
2. Petitioner Objects To magistrates Recommendation Of Dismissal of Ground 3(b) Ineffective Assistance Of Trial Counsel Where He Did Not Investigate Or Interview Holbrook, Veron Campbell, Pam Price And Jermaine Campbell, And Did Not Call Campbell, Price and Jermaine Campbell To Testify.


Summaries of

Scoggins v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Aug 19, 2011
Civil Action No. 04-10814-PBS (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Scoggins v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN SCOGGINS, Petitioner v. TIMOTHY HALL, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-10814-PBS (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Bruyette v. Patrick

" Structural Sys., Inc. v. Sulfaro, 692 F. Supp. 34, 36 (D. Mass. 1988). Rule 15(d), however, "does not…