Opinion
9464-21SL
08-11-2022
DEREK D. SCOBY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION
Eunkyong Choi Special Trial Judge
For the reasons stated in respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed August 9, 2022, as well as their First Supplement to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, filed August 10, 2022, and given that respondent indicates that petitioner has no objection to the granting of this supplemented motion, it is hereby
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution as supplemented is granted, and this case, is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further
ORDERED and DECIDED that respondent, consistent with this Order, may proceed with the collection action with respect to the unpaid income tax liability for the 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 taxable years as described in the Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) under Section 6320 and/or 6330, issued to petitioners on March 1, 2021, upon which this case is based.