From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sclafano v. Sclafano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 1, 1993
627 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2937.

October 13, 1993. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 1, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Tom Johnson, J.

Lucy Sclafano, pro se appellant.

Donald G. Proctor, Jr., Deerfield Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of the defendant in this independent action for relief from a prior judgment. Despite appellant's best efforts to characterize it otherwise, we conclude that the fraud she has alleged could not possibly be anything other than intrinsic fraud, and thus her action had to be brought within one year from the entry of the judgment.

We do agree with her, however, that it was improper to tax fees and costs against her under section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1991), at the summary judgment hearing without giving her prior notice. The judgment for fees and costs is therefore reversed. Upon remand, the court can reconsider the application for fees and costs upon proper notice to the parties. We also grant appellee's motion for attorney's fees on appeal but only to the extent that they are attributable to that portion of the appeal pertaining to the merits of the summary judgment.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; FEES/COSTS JUDGMENT REVERSED.

PARIENTE, J., and DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Sclafano v. Sclafano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 1, 1993
627 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Sclafano v. Sclafano

Case Details

Full title:LUCY J. SCLAFANO, APPELLANT, v. PATRICK A. SCLAFANO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 1, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Delray Beach v. Keiser

In addition, the trial court's perfunctory manner in awarding fees and costs against the City without the…