From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sciora v. New York State Dept. of Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 22, 1996

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The cause of action based upon Labor Law § 240 (1) was properly dismissed because the plaintiff was working on a highway, and not a "building" or "structure" within the meaning of this statute ( see, Matter of Dillon v. State of New York, 201 A.D.2d 793; Matter of Dillon v. State of New York, 167 A.D.2d 574; Siragusa v State of New York, 117 A.D.2d 986; see also, Matter of Manente v Ropost, Inc., 136 A.D.2d 681).

In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions. O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sciora v. New York State Dept. of Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1996
226 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Sciora v. New York State Dept. of Transp

Case Details

Full title:GENE SCIORA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

Vargas v. State of New York

Labor Law § 240(1) expressly applies to work performed on "buildings or structures". The claimant was working…

Spears v. State

Labor Law § 240 (1) imposes a nondelegable duty upon owners and general contractors to protect the safety of…