From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sciame v. Sciame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1976
54 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 29, 1976


In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 3, 1976, which denied his motion to dismiss that part of the complaint which seeks a judgment for arrears of alimony and child support due under a prior judgment of separation. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In the instant case, the parties spent their entire married life together in this State prior to the judgment of separation. The support provisions of that judgment accrued under the laws of this State. Personal jurisdiction over the defendant was properly acquired pursuant to CPLR 302 (subd [b]), which may be given retroactive effect because of the prior judgment of separation (see Lieb v Lieb, 53 A.D.2d 67). There has been no showing by the defendant husband that he justifiably relied upon the then existing law (see Simonson v International Bank, 14 N.Y.2d 281). Because the support provisions of the judgment of separation accrued under the laws of this State, the trial court may entertain the application for an award of arrears for alimony and child support (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236). Margett, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sciame v. Sciame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1976
54 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Sciame v. Sciame

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA SCIAME, Respondent, v. CHARLES SCIAME, JR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 29, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Senhart v. Senhart

Having determined that the parties did not maintain a marital domicile in New York, it follows that…

Senhart v. Senhart

The court must also note that to establish a precedent that visitation with children in New York State…