Summary
holding an order denying leave to amend an answer/counterclaim is not appealable
Summary of this case from Casey v. InchOpinion
No. 84-690.
March 28, 1985.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick Pfieffer, J.
Leon M. Boyajan, II of J. Russell Hornsby, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.
J. Don Friedman of Friedman Friedman, P.A., Longwood, for appellee Joseph Uddo, Jr.
The order appealed, the denial of a motion for leave to amend an answer and counterclaim, is not a final order, see generally Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); SCI, Inc. v. Aneco Co., 410 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), nor is it a non-final order which may be reviewed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Common law certiorari is also not available to review the order. See Hawaiian Inn v. Snead Const. Corp., 393 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.