From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwindt v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 8, 2014
565 F. App'x 884 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1563

05-08-2014

JEFFREY SCHWINDT, MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellants, v. MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellees.

JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. SCHULMAN and CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN. LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellees. With her on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING; DAVID L. CAVANAUGH and OWEN K. ALLEN, of Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interference No. 105,805.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. SCHULMAN and CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellees. With her on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING; DAVID L. CAVANAUGH and OWEN K. ALLEN, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Schwindt v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 8, 2014
565 F. App'x 884 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Schwindt v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY SCHWINDT, MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

565 F. App'x 884 (Fed. Cir. 2014)