From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwenker v. Ciaccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 30, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. Factual issues exist regarding location of the eastern boundary of Shore Drive adjoining plaintiffs' two southernmost lots and whether plaintiffs' fee and easement interests concerning Shore Drive, a paper street, were extinguished by defendant's alleged adverse possession of that land area.


Summaries of

Schwenker v. Ciaccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Schwenker v. Ciaccia

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH E. SCHWENKER et al., Appellants, v. VICTOR CIACCIA, JR., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)