Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.

Full title: JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, Appellant v. NEENAH, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

No. 2022-1951 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2022-1951 2022-1952 2022-1953

10-11-2023

JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, Appellant v. NEENAH, INC., Appellee

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan &Dawson PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT. JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-01361, IPR2020-01363, IPR2021-00016.

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan &Dawson PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT.

JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.