From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schweizer v. Peery

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:20-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P

07-21-2021

TYLER CHRISTOPHER SCHWEIZER, Petitioner, v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to object to the Court's findings and recommendations issued on June 29, 2021. ECF Nos. 19, 20. The Court recommended that Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. ECF No. 19 at 11. The parties had fourteen days to object to the findings and recommendations. Id.

Petitioner contends that he did not receive a copy of the findings and recommendations until July 7, 2021, that he is a layman needing additional time to research, and that he has limited access to a prison law library. ECF No. 20 at 1. He moves for an extension of sixty days. Id. For good cause shown, the Court will grant the requested extension.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED.

2. Petitioner may file objections to the Court's findings and recommendations within sixty (60) days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Schweizer v. Peery

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 21, 2021
2:20-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Schweizer v. Peery

Case Details

Full title:TYLER CHRISTOPHER SCHWEIZER, Petitioner, v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2021)