From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead v. Barton (In re Schwein Estate)

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 2, 2016
SC: 153522 (Mich. Nov. 2, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153522

11-02-2016

In re SCHWEIN Estate SANDY MEAD, Personal Representative for the Estate of DAVID SCHWEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KEVIN BARTON, TERRI ANDERSON and MEREDITH BARTON, Respondents-Appellees.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 324305
Ingham Probate Ct: 13-002609-DE

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of proceedings ordered on July 29, 2016 is DISSOLVED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 2, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Mead v. Barton (In re Schwein Estate)

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 2, 2016
SC: 153522 (Mich. Nov. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Mead v. Barton (In re Schwein Estate)

Case Details

Full title:In re SCHWEIN Estate SANDY MEAD, Personal Representative for the Estate of…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 2, 2016

Citations

SC: 153522 (Mich. Nov. 2, 2016)