From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schweigert v. U.S. Elections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 22, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01706 (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-01706

08-22-2016

Margaret Elizabeth Schweigert, Plaintiff, v. United States Elections, Defendant.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 8/22/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

In a conclusory fashion, the plaintiff alleges that the media has misreported and tampered with the primary elections for the President of the United States. Compl. at 1. She further alleges that the Federal Election Commission was "ineffective[] in reporting election[] results in primaries and caucuses," and thus fed the public "false information." Id. She concludes with a "[r]equest of the court [to] rectify" the situation. Id. at 2. The plaintiff does not explain what she means by "rectify," and the Court therefore is unable to determine what relief she seeks. Nor does the plaintiff include a statement showing that she is entitled to any relief. As drafted the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) and it will be dismissed.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: 8/22/16

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Schweigert v. U.S. Elections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 22, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-01706 (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Schweigert v. U.S. Elections

Case Details

Full title:Margaret Elizabeth Schweigert, Plaintiff, v. United States Elections…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-01706 (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2016)