Summary
reversing a circuit court's order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction made by substantially the same defendants as in this case
Summary of this case from Schwartzberg v. KnoblochOpinion
No. 1D11–2557.
2012-01-24
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.Daniel E. Dias and Dante M. Skourellos of Mancuso & Dias, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. Isaac R. Ruiz–Carus of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.Daniel E. Dias and Dante M. Skourellos of Mancuso & Dias, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants. Isaac R. Ruiz–Carus of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants allege the trial court erred in denying their motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We agree with appellants and find that this case is materially indistinguishable from Greystone Tribeca Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Ronstrom, 863 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), and Extendicare, Inc. v. Estate of McGillen, 957 So.2d 58 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions that the trial court vacate its prior order and dismiss the claims against appellants for lack of personal jurisdiction.