From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. U.S. Rubber Corp.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 25, 1972
118 N.J. Super. 128 (App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1972 —

Decided January 25, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEONARD and CARTON.

Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Roger C. Ward argued the cause for respondent Uniroyal, Inc. ( Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Kipp, attorneys; Mr. Richard L. Zucker, on the brief).

Mr. Edward C. Hillis argued the cause for respondents Catherine Schwartz and Roger Schwartz ( Mr. Henry O. Habick, attorney).


This appeal involves the issue whether any retroactive effect should be given to the decision in France v. A.P.A. Transport Corp., 56 N.J. 500 (1970), which allows suits between unemancipated children and their parents for injuries suffered as a result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle. We conclude that Darrow v. Hanover Township, 58 N.J. 410 (1971), controls as is indicated by the June 8, 1971 order of the Supreme Court denying certification of the then pending appeal in this case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. U.S. Rubber Corp.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 25, 1972
118 N.J. Super. 128 (App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Schwartz v. U.S. Rubber Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RYAN SCHWARTZ, LINDA SCHWARTZ, RANDY SCHWARTZ, ROGER SCHWARTZ, JR.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 25, 1972

Citations

118 N.J. Super. 128 (App. Div. 1972)
286 A.2d 724

Citing Cases

Di Martino v. Ventrella

On September 29, 1971, this court granted defendant Vittorio Di Martino's motion to dismiss all claims…

State v. DeSanto

Compare State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56 (1976), and State v. Jamison, 64 N.J. 363 (1974), with State v. Drayton,…