From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 30, 2011
No. CV10-2128 PHX-DGC (DKD), No. CR98-0662 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV10-2128 PHX-DGC (DKD), No. CR98-0662 PHX-DGC.

June 30, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, Magdalena Ester Schwartz has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence, which the Court has construed as a petition for writ of coram nobis. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan has issued a report and recommendation ("R R") recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 7 at 5. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R R and deny the petition.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R R (Doc. 7) is accepted.
2. The motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 1) is denied.
3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied
4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 30, 2011
No. CV10-2128 PHX-DGC (DKD), No. CR98-0662 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Schwartz v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Magdalena Ester Schwartz, Petitioner, v. United States of America…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 30, 2011

Citations

No. CV10-2128 PHX-DGC (DKD), No. CR98-0662 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2011)