From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Niki Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1995
222 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 5, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.).


The within action seeks damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff Herbert H. Schwartz during a robbery in the men's room of a building owned or managed by the defendants.

Although the gravamen of plaintiffs' complaint is that defendants negligently failed to take reasonable precautionary measures to provide adequate security and surveillance in the building, in countering defendants' motion for summary judgment plaintiffs failed to provide any evidence indicating that the person who attacked plaintiff was an intruder or gained access to the building because of any lapse in security. Under these circumstances, there is no triable issue of fact as to whether any alleged negligence on defendants' part was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries ( see, Dawson v New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 55) and summary judgment was warranted.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Niki Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 1995
222 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Niki Trading Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT H. SCHWARTZ et al., Respondents, v. NIKI TRADING CORPORATION et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 481

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Wash. 2302 Plaza Assocs., L.P.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to provide any evidence indicating that the persons who attacked him were…

Ramos v. Wash. 2302 Plaza Assocs., L.P.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to provide any evidence indicating that the persons who attacked him were…