From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber Trim Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1969
24 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1969)

Opinion

Argued January 8, 1969

Decided April 10, 1969

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, J. IRWIN SHAPIRO, J.

Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondents-appellants.

Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.

Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judges KEATING and BREITEL dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber Trim Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1969
24 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1969)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber Trim Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. MACROSE LUMBER TRIM CO., INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 10, 1969

Citations

24 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1969)
301 N.Y.S.2d 91
248 N.E.2d 920

Citing Cases

Wegorzewski v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.

And it should here be noted that despite contrary assertions in the above-quoted complaint, it has already…

Rodriguez v. State of New York

If there are several possible causes of injury, for one or more of which the defendant is not responsible,…