From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Interborough R.T. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1907
53 Misc. 289 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)

Opinion

March, 1907.

Charles A. Gardiner (G. Carleton Goldthwaite, of counsel), for appellant.

Steiner Petersen (Jerome Steiner, of counsel), for respondent.


Appeal from judgment rendered in the Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff for $278.75. The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendant claims that the action was for damages resulting from an assault upon plaintiff by the defendant's servants. In such a case the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction and the judgment should be reversed. Interpreting this complaint in the light of the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Busch v. Interborough R.T. Co., 187 N.Y. 388; N.Y.L.J., March 8, 1907, it will appear clearly that the cause of action set forth is the violation of defendant's contract to carry safely. The complaint sets forth facts showing that the plaintiff became a lawful passenger, and then proceeds to state that the servants of the defendant, while acting as such servants, without cause or provocation and in breach and violation of the duties and obligations of the defendant toward the plaintiff, assaulted the plaintiff, etc.

The action was for a breach of contract and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

GILDERSLEEVE and HENDRICK, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Interborough R.T. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1907
53 Misc. 289 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Interborough R.T. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PETER SCHWARTZ, Respondent, v . THE INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1907

Citations

53 Misc. 289 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
103 N.Y.S. 80

Citing Cases

Levine v. Kaufman

An execution against the person could not issue in the Municipal Court, as this court has no jurisdiction in…