From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Indymac Federal Bank

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 29, 2010
NO. CIV. 2:10-0516 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV. 2:10-0516 WBS JFM.

December 29, 2010


ORDER


The court will accept Ms. Lapin's explanation for her failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c) in this action, and accordingly will not impose sanctions pursuant to its Order of December 15, 2010. In the future, however, counsel should note that it is the responsibility of the attorney substituting out to assure that the order of substitution is filed and approved by the court before she may assume that she has been discharged from her duty of representing her client in the matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 28, 2010


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Indymac Federal Bank

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 29, 2010
NO. CIV. 2:10-0516 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Indymac Federal Bank

Case Details

Full title:PETER SCHWARTZ and JULIE RATHBONE, Plaintiffs, v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV. 2:10-0516 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2010)