From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1913
159 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

November, 1913.


Order modified so as to permit plaintiff to have an inspection of the machine on which he was injured, and its several parts, on condition that plaintiff pay to defendant the expense of employing a machinist from the shops where said machine was made, to take down the machine and, after the inspection, to set it up again; also modified as to provisions as to photographs and models; and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Foote on two days' notice. All concurred.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1913
159 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Company

Case Details

Full title:Julius Schwartz, Respondent, v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1913

Citations

159 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Citing Cases

Terre Haute Union Tran. Stor. Co. v. Pickett

In deciding this question, we may look to the evidence, and to other parts of the record, and, if it…