From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwartz v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1940
260 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

November 18, 1940.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order granting plaintiff's motion to examine defendant as an adverse party, by the operator of its street car, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Section 289 of the Civil Practice Act contemplates examination of defendant by employees who are such at the time of the examination, and if the relationship does not then exist, the court is without power to direct examination of the defendant as an adverse party through such a former employee. ( McGowan v. Eastman, 271 N.Y. 195.) Irrespective of the manner in which the relationship of employer and employee was severed, there is no statutory authority for examination of the defendant, through a former employee, as an adverse party and so there is no power in the court to direct such examination. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schwartz v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1940
260 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Schwartz v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SCHWARTZ, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN QUEENS TRANSIT CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1940

Citations

260 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Vogel v. Benwil Industries, Inc.

The third-party defendant, Auto Plaza Nissan, Inc., which has been out of business since 1991, has no duty to…