From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwarcz v. Lloyd

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 6, 1958
15 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

November 6, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, CARROLL HAYES, J.

Cornelius F. Gustav and Isidore R. Tucker for appellant.

Arnold W. Knauth for respondent.


Since the determination was not on the merits the dismissal of the complaint should have been without prejudice.

The judgment and order should be modified to direct that the dismissal is without prejudice and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

Schwarcz v. Lloyd

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 6, 1958
15 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Schwarcz v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:ADOLF SCHWARCZ, Appellant, v. NORTH GERMAN LLOYD, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1958

Citations

15 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
180 N.Y.S.2d 364