From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwab v. Gadsden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 2001
286 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued June 15, 2001.

August 20, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated March 30, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants Charles Massey, Miller Tabak Hirsch Co., MTH Holdings, Inc., MTH Co., Jeffrey David Miller, Jeffrey Steven Tabak, and Gary Dean Hirsch for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the separate motion of the defendants Mitch Winkeleer and Kay Winkeleer for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Sherry O'Neill, New York, N.Y. (John A. Hyland and Robert O'Neill of counsel), for appellant.

Smetana Schwartz, Melville, N.Y. (Arthur Simuro of counsel), for respondents Charles Massey, Miller Tabak Hirsch Co., MTH Holdings, Inc., MTH Co., Jeffrey David Miller, Jeffrey Steven Tabak, and Gary Dean Hirsch.

Curtis Vasile Devine McElhenny, Merrick, N.Y. (Robert M. Smith and Hugh Larkin of counsel), for respondents Mitch Winkeleer and Kay Winkeleer.

Before: Sondra Miller, J.P., Howard Miller, Robert W. Schmidt, Barry A. Cozier, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff allegedly was assaulted during a basketball game by two members of the opposing team, the defendants Theodore Gadsden and Andrew Richards. Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the Supreme Court correctly determined that he failed to prove that the organizers of the league, or the sponsors of the team for which Gadsden and Richards played, should have foreseen the assault. Accordingly, they can not be held liable for the spontaneous criminal acts of Gadsden and Richards (see, Tannenbaum v. Town of Hempstead, 255 A.D.2d 309; Thomas v. United States Soccer Fedn., 236 A.D.2d 600).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Schwab v. Gadsden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 2001
286 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Schwab v. Gadsden

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY SCHWAB, APPELLANT, v. THEODORE GADSDEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 502