From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schutzues v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-367 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-367 Erie.

September 13, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 16, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on August 23, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed as moot. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on August 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Schutzues v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 13, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-367 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Schutzues v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:TODD SCHUTZUES, Petitioner, v. MARILYN BROOKS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 13, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-367 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 13, 2006)