From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schutte v. Uline, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 1, 2013
CV 12-405 (LDW) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CV 12-405 (LDW) (WDW)

08-01-2013

KRISTIN SCHUTTE, Plaintiff, v. ULINE, INC. d/b/a ULINE SHIPPING and TIMOTHY MCDONOUGH, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge

Plaintiff Kristin Schutte brings this action against defendants Uline, Inc. d/b/a Uline Shipping and Timothy McDonough, claiming that defendants discriminated against her based on gender in violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.,and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 290 et seq. Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

Upon consideration, the Court finds that genuine disputes of material fact exist precluding the entry of summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (party seeking summary judgment must demonstrate that "there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law"); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Gallo v. Prudential Residential Servs. Ltd. P'ship, 22 F.3d 1219, 1223-24 (2d Cir. 1994). Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied.

SO ORDERED.

_____________________

LEONARD D. WEXLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: Central Islip, New York

August 1, 2013


Summaries of

Schutte v. Uline, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 1, 2013
CV 12-405 (LDW) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Schutte v. Uline, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KRISTIN SCHUTTE, Plaintiff, v. ULINE, INC. d/b/a ULINE SHIPPING and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 1, 2013

Citations

CV 12-405 (LDW) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2013)