Opinion
2021-07398
12-23-2021
IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN L. SCHUNK AND JAMIE SCHUNK, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWN OF YORK AND COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (ANNE B. RIMMLER OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS. LIPPMAN O'CONNOR, BUFFALO (MATTHEW J. DUGGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF YORK. WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (PETER L. VEECH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON.
PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (ANNE B. RIMMLER OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS.
LIPPMAN O'CONNOR, BUFFALO (MATTHEW J. DUGGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF YORK.
WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (PETER L. VEECH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Thomas E. Moran, J.), entered June 5, 2020. The order denied the motion of claimants for leave to reargue and renew their application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Schunk v Town of York ([appeal No. 1] - A.D.3d - [Dec. 23, 2021] [4th Dept 2021]).