From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schulz v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 11, 2013
No. 05-12-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-00299-CR No. 05-12-00300-CR

07-11-2013

COURTNI MICHELLE SCHULZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Affirm as modified and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-00501-J, F11-00342-J


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Bridges, FitzGerald, and Myers

Opinion by Justice Bridges

Courtni Michelle Schulz waived a jury and pleaded guilty to credit card abuse and theft of property from an elderly person valued at $500 or more but less than $1,500. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(3), (f)(3)(A), 32.31(b), (d) (West 2011 & Supp. 2012). Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on five years' community supervision, and assessed a $1,000 fine and $85,506.22 in restitution in each case. In her sole issue on appeal, appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support the amount of restitution ordered. In our opinion of February 27, 2013, we sustained appellant's issue, set aside the trial court's restitution orders, and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the proper amount of restitution.

On April 12, 2013, we reinstated the appeals and adopted the trial court's findings that the parties reached an agreement regarding the amount of restitution. We have received supplemental records containing the amended community supervision condition that orders appellant to pay $45,000 in restitution. Accordingly, we modify the trial court's judgments to reflect the restitution amount is $45,000 in each case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex. App-Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd).

As modified, we affirm the trial court's judgments. Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
120299F.U05

_______________

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

COURTNI MICHELLE SCHULZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-12-00299-CR


Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F10-00501-J).

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,

Justices FitzGerald and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's order of deferred adjudication is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled "Restitution" is modified to show "$45,000."

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's order of deferred adjudication.

_______________

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

COURTNI MICHELLE SCHULZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-12-00300-CR


Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F11-00342-J).

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,

Justices FitzGerald and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's order of deferred adjudication is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled "Restitution" is modified to show "$45,000."

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's order of deferred adjudication.

_______________

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Schulz v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 11, 2013
No. 05-12-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Schulz v. State

Case Details

Full title:COURTNI MICHELLE SCHULZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 11, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-00299-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2013)