From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schulz v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 23, 1938
254 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

March 23, 1938.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.


Order modified by providing that paragraphs seventh and fourteenth and the second alleged cause of action in the fourth amended complaint be struck out, with the privilege to the plaintiff to serve the fifth amended complaint upon payment of ten dollars costs, within twenty days, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Paragraph seventh is not a sufficient allegation either of payment or of good tender or of any other material matter. Paragraph fourteenth is meaningless. The second alleged cause of action is wholly redundant. The whole complaint might well be redrafted in the interest of conciseness and clarity. All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, in an action on an insurance policy.)


Summaries of

Schulz v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 23, 1938
254 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Schulz v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Case Details

Full title:MARY C. SCHULZ, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)