From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schultz v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00493-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00493-BNB

05-09-2013

GLENN J. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. U.S. GOVT., COLORADO STATE GOVT., CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER VARIOUS GOVT., and STATE, CITY AGENCIES, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Glenn J. Schultz, currently resides in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Schultz, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint. After review, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland determined that Mr. Schultz failed to comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Magistrate Judge Boland found that the Complaint is unintelligible and fails to set forth a short and plain statement of Mr. Schultz's claims showing that he is entitled to relief and to identify the proper jurisdiction for his claims. Magistrate Judge Boland directed Mr. Schultz to file an Amended Complaint. Mr. Schultz was given thirty days to file the Amended Complaint. Mr. Schultz now has failed to communicate with the Court within the time allowed and has failed to file the Amended Complaint.

The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Boland correctly instructed Mr. Schultz to file an Amended Complaint that complies with Rule 8. Because Mr. Schultz has failed to file an Amended Complaint within the time allowed the action will be dismissed.

Finally, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Schultz files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to file an Amended Complaint and for failure to prosecute. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 9th day of May, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Schultz v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00493-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Schultz v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GLENN J. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. U.S. GOVT., COLORADO STATE GOVT., CITY AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00493-LTB (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)