From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schultz v. DeClusin

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Apr 14, 2022
973 N.W.2d 2 (N.D. 2022)

Opinion

No. 20210315

04-14-2022

Tiffany SCHULTZ, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Zachary DECLUSIN, Defendant and Appellee

Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellant. Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee.


Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.

Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Tiffany Schultz appeals from an amended judgment awarding primary residential responsibility of their child to Zachary DeClusin. She also appeals from a money judgment awarding DeClusin $17,159.63 in attorney's fees and costs. Schultz claims the district court clearly erred in awarding DeClusin primary residential responsibility, and the court abused its discretion by awarding DeClusin attorney's fees and costs. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Schultz v. DeClusin

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Apr 14, 2022
973 N.W.2d 2 (N.D. 2022)
Case details for

Schultz v. DeClusin

Case Details

Full title:Tiffany SCHULTZ, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Zachary DECLUSIN, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

973 N.W.2d 2 (N.D. 2022)