From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schult v. Albring

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 11, 2015
344 P.3d 32 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

08CV0066 A149090.

02-11-2015

Arthur W. SCHULT, III, and Susan Schult, husband and wife; and Curtis P. Arndt, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Robert ALBRING, et. al., Defendants, and Robert Gruntz, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert Gruntz filed the briefs pro se. Michael W. Peterkin and Peterkin & Associates filed the brief for respondents.


Robert Gruntz filed the briefs pro se.

Michael W. Peterkin and Peterkin & Associates filed the brief for respondents.

Before DUNCAN, Presiding Judge, and LAGESEN, Judge, and FLYNN, Judge.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.Defendant appeals after the trial court entered a judgment of dismissal without prejudice that released a previously posted bond. A discussion of his contentions would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. It suffices to say that his appeal does not present a justiciable controversy and must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Schult v. Albring

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Feb 11, 2015
344 P.3d 32 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Schult v. Albring

Case Details

Full title:Arthur W. SCHULT, III, and Susan Schult, husband and wife; and Curtis P…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Feb 11, 2015

Citations

344 P.3d 32 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)
269 Or. App. 169