In United States v. Ankerpont, 145 F.3d 1346, 1998 WL 229606 at *3 (10th Cir. May 8, 1998, unpublished), the Tenth Circuit upheld an $8000 fine based upon the district court's determination that the defendant could pay through the IFRP during incarceration.
Summary of this case from Phillips v. BookerNo. 97-2225.
April 22, 1998.
D.N.M., 989 F.Supp. 1377.
Affirmed.
In United States v. Ankerpont, 145 F.3d 1346, 1998 WL 229606 at *3 (10th Cir. May 8, 1998, unpublished), the Tenth Circuit upheld an $8000 fine based upon the district court's determination that the defendant could pay through the IFRP during incarceration.
Summary of this case from Phillips v. BookerFull title:Schuler v. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Apr 22, 1998
Besides their general policy arguments, neither side provided the court with much legal analysis other than…
Poncho-Alderete v. United States Gov'tAnd a suspicion, by its very nature, is not a statement of fact.Cf. Schuler v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,…