From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuck et al. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
48 Okla. 533 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4611

Opinion Filed June 29, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Record — Dismissal. A record which fails to contain a copy of the final order or judgment sought to be reviewed, and in which it is not made to appear that such order or judgment is of record in the trial court, presents no question to this court for determination, and the appeal will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by Devereux, C.)

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge.

Action by W. O. Moore against H. D. Schuck and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Dismissed.

This action was commenced in the court below by the defendant in error against H. G. Schuck, A. B. Schuck, Grace M. Schuck, and Anna M. Schuck, as partners, to recover $852.50, alleged to be due by contract. The issues were submitted to the jury, who found a verdict against H. G. and A. B. Schuck, and the case is brought to this court by petition in error and case-made. The case-made shows that there was a motion for a new trial, and an order overruling it, which was excepted to; but nowhere in the case does it appear that there was ever any judgment rendered on the verdict, no judgment of any kind appearing, except the order overruling the motion for a new trial.

Giddings Giddings, for plaintiffs in error.

James S. Twyford, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and appeal must be dismissed. It has repeatedly been held by this court that, where the record fails to contain a copy of the final order or judgment sought to be reviewed, and in which it is not made to appear that the same is of record in the trial court, no question is presented to this court for its determination, and the appeal will be dismissed. Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230, 54 P. 458; Denny v. Wright, 13 Okla. 256, 74 P. 104; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543, 117 P. 198; Brown v. Territory, 15 Okla. 362, 82 P. 647; Kansas City, M. O. Ry. Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164, 124 P. 70.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Schuck et al. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 29, 1915
48 Okla. 533 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Schuck et al. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:SCHUCK et al. v. MOORE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 29, 1915

Citations

48 Okla. 533 (Okla. 1915)
150 P. 461

Citing Cases

WILLITT v. ASG INDUSTRIES, INC

This failure in the past has been held to result in there being no jurisdiction in the appellate court to…

Turner v. Wells

To the same effect see Morris v. Caulk, 44 Okla. 342, 144 P. 623, and City of Tulsa v. Kay, 124 Okla. 243,…