From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schroeppell v. Corning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1848
2 N.Y. 132 (N.Y. 1848)

Opinion

December Term, 1848

Geo. F. Comstock, for appellant.

John Ruger, for respondent.


After advisement, THE COURT were of opinion that the declaration should have conformed to the statute above mentioned, and that a new trial should be granted on that ground. No decision was made upon the other questions in the cause.

New trial granted.


Summaries of

Schroeppell v. Corning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1848
2 N.Y. 132 (N.Y. 1848)
Case details for

Schroeppell v. Corning

Case Details

Full title:SCHROEPPELL vs . CORNING

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 1, 1848

Citations

2 N.Y. 132 (N.Y. 1848)