From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schroeder v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1896
3 App. Div. 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

April Term, 1896.

John C. O'Conor and Alexander Cameron, for the appellant.

Stillman F. Kneeland, for the respondent.


The complaint in this action contains twenty-one numbered paragraphs. The cause of action is stated in paragraphs 1 to 15, inclusive. Those paragraphs allege, in substance, that the plaintiff was induced to subscribe for and purchase fifty shares of the preferred stock of the United Domestic Sewing Machine Company, in reliance upon a prospectus which the defendants caused to be published and distributed, with their names thereon as directors, with intent to influence the public, and which prospectus was largely made up of statements that were not true in fact, and were known by the defendants to be false. The subsequent paragraphs, from that numbered 16 to that numbered 21, inclusive, allege facts which, if true, are merely items of evidence tending to establish the cause of action set forth in the previous portion of the complaint. They were so regarded by the learned judge at Special Term, who expressed the opinion that they were unnecessarily pleaded, but who denied the motion to strike them out as irrelevant and redundant, because strict pleading has become, to quote his own language, "a lost art in this State."

If it be true, indeed, that the art of strict pleading is lost, we think it is the duty of the courts to do what they can to restore it, and to that end the motion in this case should be granted. Unless the provision of the Code which authorizes the court to strike out irrelevant and redundant matter is to be treated as a nullity, the appellant is entitled to relief thereunder. A party should not be compelled in pleading to admit or deny a dozen printed folios of a complaint containing nothing but the particulars of evidence which may be pertinent to the plaintiff's cause of action as proof, but which are in no wise necessary to a statement thereof. The cause of action in the present case is clearly and fully set out in the first fifteen numbered paragraphs of the complaint, and, as a matter of pleading, all that follows the fifteenth paragraph, except the prayer for judgment, is redundant and should be stricken out.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Schroeder v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1896
3 App. Div. 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Schroeder v. Post

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK A. SCHROEDER, Respondent, v . HENRY A.V. POST, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1896

Citations

3 App. Div. 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
38 N.Y.S. 677

Citing Cases

Solomon v. LaGuardia

The opinion in the Gerseta case ( supra, p. 305) states: "Where under any possible circumstances evidence of…

Powers v. Ridder

Ultimate, not evidentiary facts are to be pleaded. Possibly, the plaintiff may be permitted to prove on the…