Schroeder v. Hill

Full title: THOMAS SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Aug 15, 2019

NO. A-1-CA-36774 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2019)

Opinion

NO. A-1-CA-36774

08-15-2019

THOMAS SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Vance, Chavez & Associates Claud Eugene Vance Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Richard Hill Los Lunas, NM Pro Se Appellant

HANISEE, Judge.

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY
Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge

Vance, Chavez & Associates
Claud Eugene Vance
Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

Richard Hill
Los Lunas, NM

Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge