Opinion
Case No. 3:11-cv-04412-CRB
11-28-2011
DEBORAH L. SCHROEDER and ASTRID MENDOZA, Plaintiffs, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant.
BURSOR & FISHER P.A. By: Scott A. Bursor (SBN 276006) L. Timothy Fisher Sarah N. Westcot BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Attorneys for Defendants Leslie Bernardi and Laura Barrett in No. 3:11-cv-03992-CRB and for Plaintiffs Deborah Schroeder and Astrid Mendoza in No. 3:11-cv-04412-CRB MAYER BROWN LLP By: /s/ Kevin Ranlett Kevin Ranlett (pro hac vice) Donald M. Falk (SBN 150256) John M. Neukom (SBN 275887) Andrew J. Pincus (pro hac vice) Evan M. Tager (pro hac vice) Archis A. Parasharami (pro hac vice) Kevin Ranlett (pro hac vice) MAYER BROWN LLP Attorneys for PlaintiffAT&T MobilityLLC in No. 3:11-cv-03992-CRB and Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC in No. 3:11-cv-04412-CRB
DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256)
JOHN M. NEUKOM (SBN 275887)
MAYER BROWN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2011, Plaintiffs Deborah L. Schroeder and Astrid Mendoza commenced this action against Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") by filing a petition to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 1);
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2011, the Court related this action to AT&T Mobility LLC v. Bernardi, No. 3:11-cv-03392-CRB (N.D. Cal.) (Dkt. No. 6);
WHEREAS, in the Bernardi action, this Court had entered an order scheduling a case management conference on December 2, 2011 and directing the parties to submit a joint case management statement at least seven days beforehand (Bernardi, Dkt. No. 8);
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2011, the Court entered an order in Schroeder scheduling a case management conference for the same time on December 2, 2011 as the conference in Bernardi (Schroeder, Dkt. No. 10);
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2011, the Court granted ATTM's motion for a preliminary injunction and denied the Bernardi defendants' motion to compel arbitration and the Schroeder plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and petition to compel arbitration (Bernardi, Dkt. No. 86; Schroeder, Dkt. No. 29);
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2011, the Bernardi defendants filed their Answer, which asserted two counterclaims against ATTM (Bernardi, Dkt. No. 87);
WHEREAS, ATTM's response to the counterclaims in Bernardi is due on December 5, 2011, and ATTM intends to notice any motion responding to those counterclaims for a hearing on January 13, 2012;
WHEREAS, the parties stipulate that it would be more efficient to combine the case management conferences in Bernardi and Schroeder with the hearing on any motion responding to the counterclaims in Bernardi;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between ATTM and the defendants in Bernardi and the plaintiffs in Schroeder that, with the Court's permission, the case management conferences in Bernardi and Schroeder shall be continued until January 13, 2012 and combined with the hearing on any motion responding to the counterclaims in Bernardi.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
BURSOR & FISHER P.A.
By: Scott A. Bursor (SBN 276006)
L. Timothy Fisher
Sarah N. Westcot
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Attorneys for Defendants Leslie Bernardi and
Laura Barrett in No. 3:11-cv-03992-CRB and
for Plaintiffs Deborah Schroeder and Astrid
Mendoza in No. 3:11-cv-04412-CRB
MAYER BROWN LLP
By: /s/ Kevin Ranlett
Kevin Ranlett (pro hac vice)
Donald M. Falk (SBN 150256)
John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
Andrew J. Pincus (pro hac vice)
Evan M. Tager (pro hac vice)
Archis A. Parasharami (pro hac vice)
Kevin Ranlett (pro hac vice)
MAYER BROWN LLP
Attorneys for PlaintiffAT&T MobilityLLC in
No. 3:11-cv-03992-CRB and Defendant AT&T
Mobility LLC in No. 3:11-cv-04412-CRB
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Kevin Ranlett hereby attests that the signatories' concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. [PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Charles R. Breyer