From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schrock v. Saif Corporation

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 21, 1991
814 P.2d 562 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

WCB 89-09148; CA A67012

Argued and submitted June 12, 1991

Affirmed August 21, 1991

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Charles D. Maier and Gatti, Gatti, Maier Associates, Salem, filed the brief for petitioner.

Thomas E. Ewing, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jerome Lidz, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed in part and remanded for award of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.


The Workers' Compensation Board did not err in upholding employer's denial of chiropractic treatment.

Employer rescinded its denial of ultrasound treatment at the hearing, and claimant sought attorney fees under ORS 656.386. After the Board's decision denying attorney fees, the legislature amended ORS 656.386 to allow for attorney fees in this type of situation. That amendment applies retroactively to cases in which the order was not final on or before the effective date of the act. SB 540, § 3 (1991).

Reversed in part and remanded for award of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

Schrock v. Saif Corporation

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 21, 1991
814 P.2d 562 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Schrock v. Saif Corporation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Carla J. Schrock, Claimant. Carla J…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 21, 1991

Citations

814 P.2d 562 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
814 P.2d 562