From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schrager v. Ransohoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1992
186 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 6, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.).


Defendants' motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) was not made within a reasonable time after commencement of the action, made as it was seven years after the action was commenced, six and one-half years after the court had denied a prior motion to change venue, after discovery and many conferences had been completed, and after the case had been placed on the trial calendar (see, Scott v Ecker Mfg. Corp., 161 A.D.2d 347, 348). In addition, we agree with the IAS Court that the motion was not supported by an adequate statement specifying the manner in which the prospective witnesses would be inconvenienced by having to testify in Bronx County (see, Clark v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 170 A.D.2d 271).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Schrager v. Ransohoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 6, 1992
186 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Schrager v. Ransohoff

Case Details

Full title:ALAN SCHRAGER, as Executor of ROBERT E. LEADER, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)