From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schrader v. Winthrop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 17, 2000
276 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 17, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about April 13, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the motion by defendant Warner-Lambert Company and the cross motion by defendant Sterling Winthrop, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

David Paul Horowitz, for plaintiff-respondent.

Patricia D'Alvia, Daniel S. Ratner, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Andrias, Saxe, JJ.


The opinions of plaintiff's medical experts were sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether defendants' drugs, ingested by plaintiff's mother during plaintiff's gestation, caused plaintiff's birth defects, and as to whether the warnings contained in Warner-Lambert's drug, Dilantin, were adequate.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Schrader v. Winthrop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 17, 2000
276 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Schrader v. Winthrop

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN SCHRADER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STERLING WINTHROP, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 671