From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schrader v. Fraenckel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1906
113 App. Div. 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

May 25, 1906.

L.E. Warren, for the appellant.


This is an appeal from an order denying in part a motion made to correct a judgment roll. On a trial before a referee, judgment dismissing the complaint was directed and entered. Thereafter the plaintiff moved to correct the judgment roll by requiring the defendant to insert therein certain findings of fact which the referee had found in favor of the plaintiff but which had been omitted from the judgment roll; and also to remove therefrom the notice of motion for a reference, and the affidavits upon which that motion was presented. The court granted the motion, so far as to require the insertion of the findings of fact, but denied it as to striking out the affidavits and notice of motion for a reference. Those papers have no place in a judgment roll. Section 1237 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides what shall be inserted in a judgment roll, namely, "the summons; the pleadings, or copies thereof; the final judgment, and the interlocutory judgment, if any, or copies thereof; and each paper on file, or a copy thereof, and a copy of each order, which in any way involves the merits, or necessarily affects the judgment." The affidavits and notice of motion for a reference do not affect the merits or the judgment. The order of reference does affect the judgment and is properly inserted in the judgment roll as it is the evidence of the authority of the referee to act. The affidavits and notice of motion only incumber the record and should not be incorporated in the judgment roll, if objection is taken thereto. There is no object in bringing them to the attention of the court. The making of the order of reference cannot be reviewed. It was granted upon the motion of the plaintiff who is the defeated party in the action. The question is of very little practical importance in this case, but the plaintiff is technically right and the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

O'BRIEN, P.J., INGRAHAM, LAUGHLIN and CLARKE, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Order filed.


Summaries of

Schrader v. Fraenckel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1906
113 App. Div. 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Schrader v. Fraenckel

Case Details

Full title:OTTO C. SCHRADER, Appellant, v . RICHARD H. FRAENCKEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1906

Citations

113 App. Div. 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
99 N.Y.S. 137

Citing Cases

Norton Siegel, Inc. v. Nolan

At best, words loosely used in opinions are all that constitute a basis for the doctrine that a recital is…